From: Empathy promoting interventions for health professionals: a systematic review of RCTs
Outcome type (subgroup) | Number of eligible studies | SMD (95Â % CI) | P-value | Q-statistic I [2] (95Â % CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Attitude (all) | 1 [27] | 0.4 (−0.2, 0.1) | 0.95 | NA |
Knowledge /skills (all) | 1 [27] | 0.8 (0.4, 1.2) | <0.001 | NA |
Behavior (all) | 0.7 (0.3, 1.1) | <0.001 | 76.27 88Â % (80Â %, 93Â %) | |
Behavior (including studies with imputed values) | 0.8 (0.4, 1.2) | <0.001 | 132.22 91Â % (86Â %, 94Â %) | |
Behavior (experiential intervention) | 0.8 (0.3, 1.3) | <0.001 | 130.44 92Â % (88Â %, 95Â %) | |
Behavior (non-experiential intervention) | 0.7 (0.3, 1,2) | 0.001 | 1.6 NA | |
Behavior (training specifically for empathy) | 1 [27] | 0.1 (−0.3, 0.4) | 0.15 | NA |
Behavior (training for communication skills) | 0.9 (0.5, 1.3) | <0.001 | 111.47 90Â % (85Â %, 94Â %) | |
Behavior (external observer as assessor) | 1 (0.4, 1.5) | 0.001 | 84.29 92Â % (86Â %, 95Â %) | |
Behavior (health professional participant as assessor) | 0.7 (0.2, 1.3) | 0.008 | 50.15 90Â % (81Â %, 95Â %) | |
Behavior (patient as assessor) | 0.4 (−0.2, 1.2) | 0.22 | 3.27 39 % (0, 81 %) | |
Behavior (simulated interview as process of evaluation) | 0.8 (0.5, 1.1) | <0.001 | 2.53 21Â % (0, 92Â %) | |
Behavior (actual interview as process of evaluation) | 1.2 (0.3, 2.1) | 0.01 | 81.41 95Â % (91Â % 97Â %) | |
Behavior (questionnaire as process of evaluation) | 0.8 (0.3, 1.3) | 0.003 | 42.31 86Â % (73Â %, 93Â %) |